This is the text of a PDF that makes the case against 5G in plain English in 2 pages of A4. The idea is that it is suitable for printing off or sending as a Email attachment to an MP or other authority figure, or take with you to meet a school official.

Download the PDF

The case against 5G in plain English

This paper will make the case in non-technical terms that

  • 5G and indeed all cell phone technology is dangerous for human health
  • Scientists are well aware of the dangers and have been issuing warnings for some time
  • Politicians are well aware of the dangers but have been ignoring them
  • Knowledge of the dangers has been deliberately suppressed
  • Development of 5G is driven by profit motives and not health concerns

We shall start with a statement made by Céline Fremault, the Minister of the Government of the Brussels-Capital Region, responsible for Housing, Quality of Life, Environment and Energy, at a press conference at which she announced the halting of 5G deployment:
“The people of Brussels are not guinea pigs whose health I can sell at a profit” [1]

From this short statement we deduce that

  • 5G has dangerous health effects
  • The dangers are well known by some of those in power
  • One of the concerns is that it has not been tested properly – hence ‘Guinea pigs’
  • Those in power can in fact stop the rollout and will do so when it affects them
  • There is an awareness that 5G deployment is driven by profit and not by the benefits to the community or indeed at the request of the community

But how dangerous is 5G exactly and how widespread is this knowledge?

Turning our attention to a paper from the “Energy and Climate Change Committee” by Yvonne Tinckler, on our own UK parliament’s website [2] we have the following statements on WiFi in general and smart meters which use millimetre waves, that is to say, the same technology as 5G

  • There has been a decade of warnings from researchers, doctors, professors and governments, that WiFi is potentially harmful especially to children and pregnant women and should be reduced or avoided.
  • Studies show that 4–5% of individuals may have EMF hypersensitivity and when 5G becomes ubiquitous, will simply not be able for them to partake in society in any meaningful way
  • Australia acknowledges this and as a result has WiFi free zones in several hospitals
  • Smart Meters will not be removable once they are installed. It will be extremely difficult if not impossible to avoid the effects of them in a neighbourhood even if they can be removed from an individual house.
  • There is no doubt that the lack of freedom to avoid the devastating effects of microwaves will contravene several Articles on the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights.
  • May 2011 – The Council of Europe recommends that WiFi be banned from schools
  • September, 2010—Study finds that sitting at a laptop computer with the WiFi enabled for just four hours can damage sperm.
  • February, 2011—Scientists at the National Institutes of Health in the U.S. find that microwaves emitted by cell phones cause changes in the brain. These biological changes are well below the “thermal level”
  • Specifically, in the same paper, on microwave radiation such as 5G we have the statement that “In May, 2011—World Health Organization reclassified microwave radiation from wireless communication devices and mobile phones as classification ‘Class 2B possible carcinogen’. This is the same class as lead, DDT and car exhaust. “[3]

So why are we not all aware of this?
Because to some degree the information has been deliberately suppressed.
The governmental “Advisory Group on Non-Ionising Radiation” (AGNIR) was set up and having discovered the dangers, was disbanded after producing a report that omitted the WHO classification as a 2B carcinogen. See this report from the Physicians Health Initiative for Radiation and environment (PHIRE) [3][4].
The advisory group was disbanded because PHE decided “that it was no longer viable to support a dedicated standing expert advisory group to solely address non-ionising radiation,” [5]

The Nuremberg Code
5G is a new technology and is therefore necessarily untested for long term effects. Public exposure is therefore a medical experiment performed without fully informed consent and a quick glance at the Nuremberg code suggest that the 5G experiment violates all 10 articles.

The Environmental Health Trust is a reliable source for scientific information, one page simply consists of a list of 41 peer reviewed papers on the links between cell-phone radiation and cancer [6].
Proven effects include: brain cancer, breast cancer, prostate cancer, insomnia, DNA damage, oxidative stress, immune dysfunction, altered brain development, damaged reproduction, hyperactivity, memory loss, irritability, tinnitus, cataracts[7]


%d bloggers like this: